| Schmutzgeld
by Andrew Hurle
Andrew Hurle studied printmedia at the Canberra School of Art in the early
1980s, working with photocopiers and screened image reproduction techniques.
He moved to Melbourne in 1989 to study at the Victorian College of the
Arts and around this time began to use digital photocopiers and computers.
Andrew now lives and works in Sydney, exhibiting with the Darren Knight
Gallery as well as smaller artist-run galleries in Sydney and Melbourne.
He was a member of the Elastic artist-run gallery and recently co-edited
the 180 page Elastic artists publication.
For the past decade his work has been concerned with economies of printed
reproduction. His most recent exhibitions have investigated the relation
between ornamentation and printed money, the materiality of digital pornography
in print, and optical stereo lenticular imaging. Andrew Hurle currently
lectures at Sydney College of the Arts in Digital Print and Studio Theory
and also at the University of Technology, Sydney in the areas of computer
typography and web design.
|
13 January - 6 February 2005
Opening 13 January 6-9
Open Saturday & Sunday 12-6
or by appointment Tel:0207 247 1375
exhibitions@elastic.org.uk |
|
|
Money is filthy because it is exchanged without
the possibility of being properly 'cleaned'. The same material used to pay
the prostitute or bribe the policeman turns up in the charity box, or is
used topurchase pleasure for the philanthropist.
Before being exchanged on the street or in a shop, notes or bills are secured
inside the trousers; either close to the groin or the fat of one's arse,
or else kept in leather against the heart.The honest hand that extends to
accept the piece of printed paper also agrees to pass it on and does so
with a measure of good faith in the note's face value.The face of the note
itself holds an aesthetic importance - prettied up and underwritten by ornamentation
and design - it is commissioned to find acceptance in another hand regardless
of how dirty and bruised this commission eventually causes it to appear.
The exhibition 'Schmutzgeld' presents 4 or 5 small works around the theme
of 'dirty money' or, as it is phrased in colloquial english; 'filthy lucre'.A
premise of the theme is that the popular attribution of filthiness to money
is not just a reference to the means by which it is procured, but rather
expresses an ambivalence or horror at a dark space that separates its nominal
and its material value.
Printed money is unlike gold which, with a specific gravity almost twenty
times that of water, is amaterial better suited to remain motionless in
vaults or safes. In contrast, the weightlessness frippery of paper money
encourages a continual and promiscuous kind of passage through the hands
of the public body. For over a century the health of the economy has depended
on the constancy of the movement of printed paper money. If circulation
slows or, under the hysterical logic of hyper-inflation, moves too quickly,
then the body sickens. When people mean to speak cynically of money's corrupting
power and say that all money is 'blood money' they are acknowledging a simple
mechanical truth about its essential nature. Money is filthy because it
is exchanged without the possibility of being properly 'cleaned'. The same
material used to pay the prostitute or bribe the policeman turns up in the
charity box, or is used to purchase pleasure for the philanthropist. |
|
|